Disposed

Bank of Maharashtra v. Ms Devki Oil Industries

DRT25 Apr 2026OA/342/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Special and National Lok Adalat, organized by the DT, disposed of an Original Application filed by Bank of Maharashtra against Devaki Oil Industries. The bank withdrew the application after the defendant paid dues under a One Time Settlement, and court fees were refunded.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of OA No. 34212025 allowed; file closed. Court fees refunded; documents returned.

Bank of Maharashtra versus Ms Devki Oil Industries — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2026)

¶1

BE,FORE THE SPECIAL^{AND NATIONALLOK ADALAT} ORGANISEI) ON^{25APRIL.2026 IJY THE} DEBTS RECOVE,RY^{TRIBUNAL.AURANCABAD} AND DISTIIICT LEGAL^{SERVICESAUTHOIIITY}

¶2

OA No. 34212025 LSup^S-f'no.f0l to

¶3

OA Withdrawal

¶4

Annlicant(s): Bank^{of Maharastra} (hereinafter referred to as bank^{/ financial institution)}

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

Del'c ntlant(s) : Devaki^{Oil Industries} (hereinafter referred to as / borrower^{/ guarantor(s))}

¶7

D cta ils of disrrute /^{claim:The clailn of the bank is to the tune of} Rs. I.32,39,0001^{with cost and interest.}

¶8

l-he defendant/s has^{paidthe duesin his / their loan accountan amountof} Rs. 1,40,00,000/-^{(RupeesOne Crore Forty Lakh only) as settlement amount} under OTS. Therefore,^{the applicant bankdoes not want to proceed further'} HencepresentoriginalApplicationmaybewithdrawnasperthewithdrwal Pursis filed by^{the applicant bank whichis markedas 'A''}

¶9

1'he request for^{retum of originaldocuments as per rules is pennitted'} Since the matter^{is before the Special and NationalLok-Adalat, the courtFees} be refunded to^{the applicant bank as per rules,}

¶10

¶11

in view of the above Consent Terms filed on record /uploaded online. The defendant is Present/absent today.

¶12

Applicant(s)

¶13

*
#
4
Advocat e Appl
/Authorised Representative

¶14

Defenda n t(s)

¶15

Advocate for the Defendant(s) /Authorised Representative

¶16

¶17

)P ----9rf l1l^.15

¶18

Adv. Sanjay Nandure Member

¶19

Special and National Lok Adalat

¶20

(4//

¶21

Shri. Mah?6'-no Adwanr Chairman Special and National Lok Adalat

Date : 25.04.2026

Place : Aurangabad.

ORDER/AWARD

In view of the above consent terms which are filed online/offline in the present matter, the order is passed. The OA No. 34212025 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶26

Refund of Court Fees is allowed as per rules. Original documents be returned as per DRT Procedure Rules.

¶27

¶28

Datc : 25.04.2026

¶29

(Shri. Makarand Adrvant) CHAIRMAN Special and National Lok Adalat

BEFORE THE SPECIALANDNATIONAL LOK ADALAT QRGANISED ON^25th APRIL,2026 BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

OA No. 34212025

E*1" A

WITHDITAWAL PURSIS

Arrrrlicant(s): Bank ol Maharashtra

¶38

VERSUS

¶39

Defendant(s) : Devaki Oil lndustries

¶40

( hereinafter referred to as / borrower / guarantor(s) )

¶41

Details of dispute I claim: The claim of the bank is to the tune of Rs. 1,32 ,39,000 /-with cost and interest.

¶42

The defendanVs has paid the entire dues along with legal expenses in his / their loan account an amount of Rs. 1,40,00,000/- as regular closure. Therefore, the^{applicantbankdoes} not want to proceed further. Hence^present Original Application may be withdrawn^{as per} the present withdrawal Pursis filed by the bank

¶43

The request for retum of original documents as^per rules may^{be permitted. Since the} matter is before the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the^{CourtFees may please be refunded} to the applicant bank as^per rules.

¶44

Defendant(s)

¶45

Applicant(s) Defendant(s)
Sls a
*
<br>xs9
Adv te the Appli c Advocate for the Defendant(s)
/Auth nsed Representative /Authorised Representative

¶46

Date t 25-4-2026

¶47

Place :Ch}atrapati Sanibhajinagar.

¶48

Restricted

Bank of Maharashtra v. Ms Devki Oil Industries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of Maharashtra v. Ms Devki Oil Industries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Gurjit Kaur

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Baldev Singh

Punjab National Bank versus Sh. Baltej Singh

Bank of India versus Pradeep Sharma

Hdfc Bank Ltd. versus Harjeet Singh Gill

Icici Bank Limited versus Ganesh Petroleum , through Its Proprietor, Yogesh Ganesh Butale