Uco Bank v. P Kamalam
Case brief
What is this about?
This Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed the bank's application to recover agricultural loan dues from the defendants who had defaulted, approving the claim based on submitted documents and affidavits as the respondents appeared ex-parte.
What did the court decide?
Defendants directed to pay Rs.30,08,894/- with 6% p.a. simple interest from date of application and liable for deficiency if sale of mortgaged properties is insufficient.
What the court decided
OA No. 339/2022
Fair Order
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL AT MADURAI DATED THIS 03rd DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT: SEEMA SINHA,
[PR. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE – Retd] PRESIDING OFFICER
OA No.339/2022
Between
UCO Bank, Somarasampettai Branch 1/147, Main Road, Somarasampettai, Tiruchirappalli – 620102.
---Applicant Bank
And
- Mrs.P. Kamalam, W/o. Mr. Pitchai Muthuraja @ Pitchai, C-37, West Extension, 5th Cross, Thillai Nagar, Tiruchirappalli.
- Mr S. Natesan, S/o. Mr. Suppan, 5/76-A, Mela Street, Adhavathur, Somarasampettai Post, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District.
- Mr P. Ramesh @ Balasubramanian, S/o. Pitchaimuthuraj @ Pitchai, No. C-37, 6th Street West Extension, Thillai Nagar, Tiruchirappalli.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the debt amount and documents filed by the Applicant Bank are proved despite the defendants' ex-parte absence.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
UCO Bank, Somarasampettai Branch
- respondent
Mrs.P. Kamalam
- respondent
Mr S. Natesan
- respondent
Mr P. Ramesh
- respondent
Mr P. Om Prakash
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court