Canara Bank v. Chitra
Case brief
What is this about?
In an ex-parte application for recovery of dues, the DRT-III Chennai allowed the bank's claim of nearly Rs. 47 lakhs for three term loans and GECL. The bank proved its case via documentary evidence and account affidavits as the defendant failed to contest.
What did the court decide?
Recovery of Rs. 46,98,160.72 including interest on three term loans and GECL, plus costs; liberty to sell defendant's assets for recovery of balance dues.
What the court decided
O.A. No.232 of 2023
16.07.2026
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 16th day of July, 2026
Present: SMT. S.V. GOWRAMMA Presiding Officer
ORIGINAL APPLICATION No.232 of 2023
Canara Bank, Kasturba Nagar Branch, No.4, 1st Main Road, Kasturba Nagar, Adyar Chennai-600 020 ….Applicant -Vs-
Smt. M. Chitra, W/o Balamurugan, 4A3/3, Breeze Flats, Jayaraman Street, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai- 600 041 …..Defendant
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant: M/s. N.G. Durairajan
Defendant was set ex-parte on 18.12.2023
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant bank has established its claim for recovery of dues against the defendant.
Whether the Tribunal should grant an ad-interim or final order in the absence of the defendant.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Canara Bank, Kasturba Nagar Branch
Coram
S.V. Gowramma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court