Disposed
Bank of Maharashtra v. Harjinder
DRTOA/191/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Registry order directing return of the original application to the applicant bank for proper presentation before the competent court, as the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
Registry directed to return the OA to the applicant bank for proper presentation before the competent Court.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
¶2
oAlLgU2026 BANK OF MAHARASHTRA Vs HARIINDER KAUR
¶3
L9.03.2026
¶4
Item no.06
¶5
Present: Mr. Munish Yadav, Counsel for applicant bank
¶6
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/Hybrid mode.
¶7
- The Ld. counsel for the applicant bank has submitted that the present matter has wrongly been filed before the Hon'ble Tribunal and the jurisdiction of the present matter lies with the DRT, Chandigarh.
¶8
- in view of the above submission, Registry is directed to return the OA to the applicant bank for proper presentation before the competent Court.
¶9
File be consigned to record room.
¶10
t)'
¶11
(SUSHIL KWAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Bank of Maharashtra
- other
HARIINDER KAUR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court