Canara Bank v. Ramesh Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant bank withdrew the original application (OA) after reaching a compromise agreement with the respondents. The Presiding Officer dismissed the OA as withdrawn and directed refund of court fees.
What did the court decide?
Refund of court fees directed. OA dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/1890/2025 CANARA BANK Vs RAMESH KUMAR
25.02.2026 Item No.66
Present: Ms. Isha Dhingra, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Ankush Gupta, and has made a statement at the Bar that the parties have compromised the matter for a sum of Rs.6,50,000/- and she does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn . Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
HARSH
Parties & counsel
- applicant
CANARA BANK
- respondent
RAMESH KUMAR
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court