Allowed

Bank of India v. Mr. Narayan Baburao Jivrak

DRT14 May 2026OA/160/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed an original application filed by the Bank of India for recovery of loan dues of Rs. 72 lakhs against two defendants in ex-parte proceedings. The court ordered repayment with 7% simple interest and secured the claim via mortgaged properties.

What did the court decide?

Payment of Rs. 72,50,162.93 with 7% simple interest secured by sale of mortgaged immovable properties; issuance of Recovery Certificate.

Bank of India versus Mr. Narayan Baburao Jivrak — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2026)

¶1

Presented on: 28.02.2025 Registered on: 12.03.2025 Decided on: 14.05.2026 Duration: Y M D 01 02 14

¶2

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL AT AURANGABAD (Before Dr. J. R. Chauhan Presiding Officer) ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 160/2025

¶3

TOTAL CLAIM AMOUNT – Rs. 72,50,162.93/-

¶4

Bank of India

¶5

A Body Corporate constituted under the provisions of Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act V of 1970, Having its Head Office at Star House, “C-5”, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Comples, Bandra (East), Mumbai and having branches amongst other places at Lasur Station, Tq. Gangapur, Dist. Chh. Sambhajinagar, through its Power of Attorney, Mr. Vitthal Onkar Chavan, Age: 38 yrs., Occ.: Service, R/o. Chh. Sambhajinagar.

¶6

… Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

1. Mr. Narayan Baburao Jivrak,

¶9

Age: Major, Occ.: Agri., R/o.: At Post Ghodegaon, Tq. Gangapur, Dist. Chh. Sambhajinagar – 423701.

¶10

2. Mr. Santosh Baburao Jivrak,

¶11

Age: Major, Occ.: Agri., R/o.: At Post Ghodegaon, Tq. Gangapur, Dist. Chh. Sambhajinagar – 423701.

…Defendants.

(OA No.160/2025)

Page 1 of 9

[AMBADAS]

APPEARANCES

For the Applicant Mr. K.D. Pande Advocate For Defendants Ex-parte

¶18

JUDGMENT

¶19

Delivered on 14.05.2026

¶20

The Applicant Bank has filed the present application for the

¶21

recovery of a sum of Rs. 72,50,162.93/- (Rupees Seventy Two Lacs, Fifty Thousand, One Hundred Sixty Two and Ninety Three Paisa only), along with further interest from the date of filing of the Original Application, i.e., 28.02.2025, until the date of realization of the entire outstanding dues from the Defendants.

¶22

Brief facts of the application are as under:

¶23

That, the Defendant No. 1 had approached to the Applicant bank and requested to sanction a Term loan facility and Crop Loan facility. Upon considering the request and need of the defendants, the Applicant Bank sanctioned a Term loan of Rs. 13,50,000/- & Crop loan facility of Rs. 5,80,000/- vide sanction letter dated

¶24

09.04.2012 on certain terms and conditions. The agreed rate of

(OA No.160/2025)

Page 2 of 9

[AMBADAS]

interest was @ 14.75% p.a. and @ 14.25 p.a. respectively with half

¶29

yearly rests. The defendants also agreed to pay an additional interest by way of liquidated damages @ 2% p.a. in case of default in repayment.

¶30

That, Thereafter, upon the request and demand of the defendants, the above Crop Loan Facility came to be renewed and restructured to the extent of Rs. 7,67,410/- on 30.09.2015 on certain terms and conditions.

¶31

In order to secure the aforesaid loan facilities, the Defendants executed various loan documents in favour of the Applicant Bank, including the sanction letter, demand promissory notes, registered mortgage deed bearing daybook no. 1732 dated 10.04.2012 r/w. registered correction deed bearing daybook No. 3360 dated 28.07.2014. Additionally Defendant No. 2 stood as guarantor for Defendant No.1 and executed a Deed of Guarantee dated 09.04.2012 in favour of the Applicant Bank.

(OA No.160/2025)

Page 3 of 9

[AMBADAS]

The Applicant Bank further contends that, in order to secure the Loan sanctioned to them, the Defendant No. 1 created first charge over immovable properties by executing registered mortgage

¶36

deed bearing daybook no. 1732 dated 10.04.2012 r/w. registered correction deed bearing daybook No. 3360 dated 28.07.2014, in favour of the Applicant Bank. The mortgage was created in respect of the following properties –

¶37

i) All that piece and parcel of Agricultural land, admeasuring 0 H 8 Acre 18 Guntha out of Gat No. 141, situated at Village Kolghar, Tq. Gangapur, Dist. Aurangabad, which is bounded as under: East :- Land of Latabai, West :- Land of Raju Nilekar, South:- Land of Kalyan Dolsar, North: - Land of Santosh Jivrak.

¶38

ii) All that piece and parcel of Agricultural land, admeasuring 0H 80 R out of Gat No. 188, situated at Village Ghodegaon, Tq. Gangapur, Dist. Aurangabad, which is bounded as under: East :- Land of Vasanth Jagannath, West :- Land of Balasaheb Rangnath, South:- Land of Santosh Baburao, North: - Land of Gajanan Pawar.

¶39

iii) All that piece and parcel of Agricultural land, admeasuring 0H 89 R out of Gat No. 189, situated at Village Ghodegaon, Tq. Gangapur, Dist. Aurangabad, which is bounded as under:

(OA No.160/2025)

Page 4 of 9

[AMBADAS]

East :- Land of Shantabai Pawar, West :- Shiv, South:- Land of Shriram, North: - Land of Santosh Baburao.

¶44

The applicant bank contended that the defendants have failed to keep their promise and commitments agreed by them with regard to due repayment of the loan amount. The defendants failed to operate the loan account properly and failed to pay the agreed rate of interest as per terms and conditions of the sanction letter. Thereafter, the applicant bank repeatedly made demand of loan amount and called upon the defendants to pay with the agreed rate of interest thereon, but the defendants failed and neglected to pay the same. The loan account of the defendant became irregular and classified as NPA on 31.03.2018. Therefore on 08.02.2025 the applicant bank issued legal notice to the defendants through their advocate. Despite service of Notices, the defendants failed and neglected to repay the outstanding dues of the applicant Bank. Hence, this application is filed.

(OA No.160/2025)

Page 5 of 9

[AMBADAS]

The defendants failed to appear in matter though they were served through RPAD. Hence, the defendants were proceeded exparte as per Order dated 24.12.2025.

¶49

The applicant Bank has filed Claim Affidavit of evidence at Exhibit-04 of Mr. Vitthal Onkar Chavan, POA of the applicant Bank, and has produced on record the original loan transaction documents as Exh. A-1 to A-28 as per list of documents Exh.05 which corroborates the case of the applicant Bank.

¶50

I have heard arguments of the learned Advocate for the applicant Bank.

¶51

Since the defendants failed to appear and did not contest the application, I find no reason to disbelieve the unrebutted evidence of the applicant Bank. Therefore, the applicant Bank is entitled for the reliefs as claimed.

¶52

The applicant Bank has claimed charge over immovable properties of the borrower which are mortgaged in favour of the applicant bank.

(OA No.160/2025)

Page 6 of 9

[AMBADAS]

The applicant Bank has claimed future interest @14.25%per annum from the date of filing i.e. 28.02.2025 of this application till realization of the claim amount. However, considering the facts of the case, I am of the opinion that if future interest is granted @ 7% per annum (simple) on outstanding amount, it would be just and reasonable rate of interest.

¶57

ORDER

¶58

(A) Original Application No. 160/2025 is allowed with

¶59

costs.

¶60

(B) The defendants shall pay jointly and severally to the applicant Bank a sum of Rs. 72,50,162.93/- (Rupees Seventy Two Lacs, Fifty Thousand, One Hundred Sixty Two and Ninety Three Paisa only), along with future interest @ 7% per annum (simple) from the date of filing of the O.A. i.e. 28.02.2025 till full payment/realization of the amount mentioned in this operative order.

(OA No.160/2025)

Page 7 of 9

[AMBADAS]

following immovable properties vide documents at Exh.

¶66

A-11 & A-12 in list of documents Exh. 5.

¶67

¶68

¶69

iii) All that piece and parcel of Agricultural land, admeasuring 0H 89 R out of Gat No. 189, situated at Village Ghodegaon, Tq. Gangapur, Dist. Aurangabad, which is bounded as under: East :- Land of Shantabai Pawar, West :- Shiv, South:- Land of Shriram, North: - Land of Santosh Baburao.

(OA No.160/2025)

Page 8 of 9

[AMBADAS]

(D) The applicant Bank is entitled to sell the mortgaged immovable properties and hypothecated articles/goods etc., to recover its dues.

¶74

(E) Issue Recovery Certificate accordingly.

¶75

(F) The Registrar is directed to send the copy of the Judgment and Recovery Certificate to the applicant and defendants.

¶76

(G) File be consigned to the record room.

¶77

Sd/-

¶78

Pronounced in open court. (Dr. J. R. Chauhan) Place: Aurangabad Presiding Officer Date:.14.05.2026 Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

¶79

(OA No.160/2025)

¶80

Page 9 of 9

¶81

[AMBADAS]

Bank of India v. Mr. Narayan Baburao Jivrak

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of India v. Mr. Narayan Baburao Jivrak

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Axis Bank versus Mr. Bharat Atmaram Solunke

Maharastra Gramin Bank versus M/S Capgi Industries Private Limited

The Ahmednagar District Central Cooperative Bank Limited versus Bank of India

State Bank of India versus Mr. Mohammad Jakir Mohammad Shabbir

Idbi Bank versus Ravindrakumar Renukadas Joshi

Union Bank of India versus Akrur Sukhdev Pimpale