Canara Bank v. Sivagnanam
Case brief
What is this about?
Application filed by Bank of Baroda for condonation of 113 days delay in re-presenting an Original Application. Tribunal condoned delay relying on High Court precedent, conditioning approval on payment of costs and timely filing.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 113 days in representing the OA is condoned subject to payment of Rs.1000/- cost and filing compliance report.
What the court decided
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 10th day of July, 2026
Present: SMT. S.V. GOWRAMMA Presiding Officer
M.A. No.153 of 2026 in OA Dy.No.1077/2024
Bank of Baroda, T.Nagar Branch, No.74, Sir Thyagaraya Road, Pondy Bazaar, T. Nagar, Chennai -600 017. ...Applicant
-Vs-
- Mr. S. Karunakaran,
- No.37, Arcot Road, Valasaravakkam, Thiruvallur, Alwarthirunagar,
Chennai -600 087.
- Mrs. K. Latha,
No.37, Arcot Road, Valasaravakkam, Thiruvallur, Alwarthirunagar,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 113 days in re-presenting the OA due to counsel's bad health can be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bank of Baroda, T.Nagar Branch
- respondent
Mr. S. Karunakaran
- respondent
Mrs. K. Latha
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court