In an application under Order VIII Rule 1A RCD Act, petitioner prayed withdrawal due to settlement. Court allowed withdrawal and directed refund of court fees upon application's disposal.
Application disposed of; registry directed to refund court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 65
Case No. OA/1527/2023
PEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PVT LTD Vs MS MK ENTERPRISES
Date: 02.04.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Ms. Vidisha Kaul, Counsel for the Applicant
Ms. Anjali Sharma, Counsel for the Defendants
In this matter, Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank submits that account stands settled and he prayed for withdrawal of this Original Application and refund of court fee.
In view of the above submission, this Original Application stands disposed of. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
PEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PVT LTD
MS MK ENTERPRISES
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
