ii. TATA LPT 4825 G BSVI bearing Registration No. PB06BC2091, Engine No. 7B6A250D02122E64214496, Chassis No. MAT820006N1E15266; iii. TATA LPT 4830 BS VI bearing Registration No. PB06BE3291, Engine No. B67B62300D02132D64286920, Chassis No. MAT566013P1D11364; iv. TATA LPT 4830 BS VI bearing Registration No. PB06BE7691, Engine No. B67B62300D02132E64299122, Chassis No. MAT566013P1F16493; Copy of virtual registration certificates of the above hypothecated vehicles was filed on 12.08.2026 vide Dairy no.15232. Documents executed: Statement of Account dated 15.09.2025, which are Annexures A11 to A15 to this OA; Legal Notice dated 22.09.2025, which is Annexure A16 to this OA; Original Postal Receipts dated 22.09.2025, which are Annexures A17 & A18 to this OA. 5. The loan accounts became irregular and were classified as NPA and after adjusting debit and credit entries in loan accounts, there was a debit of Rs.68,86,234.20 (Rupees Sixty Eight Lac Eighty Six Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Four and Paise Twenty Only), which is recoverable and the defendants were served recall notices but they did not repay the outstanding amount, therefore, the applicant requested to accept the application and to issue Recovery Certificate accordingly. 6. The defendants were served summons to appear before this Tribunal but no one appeared on behalf of defendants and they were proceeded ex-parte vide order dated 06.01.2026. 7. In support of the OA, affidavit of Sh. Rajendra Prasad, Authorised Representative, HDFC Bank Limited, h as been filed. 8. Heard ex-parte arguments and perused record. 9. It was argued by learned counsel through vide conferencing, for applicant that in view of the documentary evidence brought on record which had gone unrebutted, the applicant had proved its case. From the perusal of all the Annexures A1 to A18 to this OA, it is proved that the Defendant no. 1 approached applicant for availing of the loan facilities, which were granted to him. Sh. Nirvail Singh Goraya
