Disposed
Uco Bank v. M/S Jai Durga Traders
DRTOA/1456/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. ORDER. SI{EET
¶2
PAGE NO
¶3
CASE NO
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHEORDER I |
REIIARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA1456tZa j0.01i26 |
Appticantby ShriAtut Chaudhary'Advocate . NonefortheDefendants CounsetfortheApplicantfitedanApPli:3tionlor ;;,il;ili;"a"t"oib'rl:i''itntnio"itofshrlsanjav Kumar,Representativeotti't"UCOBank'ltis.statedthatin theinstant0Athe"pprtt"ni hivesetttedthe,accountby deoositingan amountot*'i" zr-uftnhasbeendepositedas setttement.TheCounsett"i lpptitittpraysfoiwlthdrawat of thePresentOA' [i*#}gqffiffi,$$}$$;,[ffi disposedofaswithdralt recordroom. |
|
| (Pravasrur$$ngnl Presidingofflcer, DRT:LUCKNOW lncharge:DRTJabatPur |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Srisanjay Kumar
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
AI extract
Prasann Kumar Das
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court