Bank of India v. Ms Star Technologies
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT D. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO
CASE NO
DATE l
DESCRTPTION OF THE.
ORDER]
REMARK
{trtrzs
30.01.26 Appticant by Shri Shubh Chaudaha, Advocate
None for the Defendants
Fi,i-tliirrft Tf,l'iiJtiiiiffi fi H#'^ill!:::i?
ts deposed that in the rnstant olirre-liiiiaiiifil# sertred
iH,',ffi ":,'t1ii"Hi;iliffjJfl,Jln :r.g"1,,m
for wlthdrawal of the present Ol. -"-' 'e sPPrrLct
Considering the affidavit-of the .Officer of the applicant
bank and the submission made by tt" iil,I"tiii, ifpticant
that the towards settlement appucant has of deposited;; the case, the ,ilili*r' prgsent OA *rs standsr_"r,r,
disposed of as withdraw
record room. n. Record be cbnsened to the
Q.r
(Pravas Kumar\insht
Presidtng officerl- '
DRT: LUGINOW:
lncharge: DRXJabatpur
',
q.*..
:iFrrF*.*- "k>
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Defendants
Coram
Pravas Kumar Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court