Icici Bank Limited v. Nityanand Food Product
Case brief
What is this about?
O A disposed of as withdrawn after Bank applicant accepted Rs.47.56 Lakhs deposited by respondents towards final settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER - SHEET
PAGE NO
CASE NO
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA1261t73 30 t01t76 |
ppticantby Shri VedantAgrawal,Advocate NonefortheDefendants atterwastakenup onthebasisofanappticationfor urgenthearingfitedonZ0/01/26. |
|
| CounselforApp[icantfitedanappticationfor withdrawalofthecasesupportedwithaffidavitof ShriVineetBhasin,Manager.ltis statedthatduring thependencyofthemattersettlementhasarrived at betweenthePartiesandtheDefendantshave depositedtheamountofRs.47.56Lakhtowardsfutl andfina[setttement.TheCounseIforAppticantprays for withdrawal of thepresent0A. |
||
| ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheOfficerofthe Appticant-Bankandthesubmissionmadebythe CounselforAppticantthattheDefendanthas depositedanamountofRs.47.56Lakhtowardsfutl andfinalsettlementofthecase,thepresentOA standsdisposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbe consignedto therecordroom. |
||
| a'. (PravasKumarSingh) Presidingofficer DRT:LUCKNOW lncharge:DRT JABALPUR |
Applicant-Bank
Defendants
Pravas Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court