Yes Bank v. Satyanaryan Meena
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 16
Case No.OA/1161/2026
YES BANK Vs SATYANARYAN MEENA
Date: 14.08.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Applicant None for the defendants
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this OA and also requested to return the court fee.
Request is allowed.
As the applicant wants to withdraw this OA, therefore OA stands disposed of as withdrawn. Court fees may be returned as per the rules. All pending IAs stands disposed of, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- applicant
YES BANK
- respondent
SATYANARYAN MEENA
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court