Dismissed

Bank of Maharashtra v. Haribhau Narayan Kapare

DRT25 Apr 2026OA/115/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Special and National Lok Adalat allowed the withdrawal of an Original Application filed by the Bank of Maharashtra against Haribhau Narayan Kapre, wherein the claim was fully settled via One-Time Settlement, granting refund of court fees and return of documents.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the Original Application allowed; refund of court fees granted; return of original documents permitted.

Bank of Maharashtra versus Haribhau Narayan Kapare — Insolvency and Bankruptcy | DRT (2026)

¶1

BEFOITE THE SPECIALANDNATIONALLOK^ADALAT ORGANISED ON^{25APRIL'2026BY THE} DEBTS RECOVERY^{TRIBT]NAL. AURANGABAI)} AND DISTITICT^{LEGAL SERVICESAUTHORITY}

¶2

OA No. 115/2026^{(Sr.no.8 (Suprrlementarv)) (} !) OA Withdrawal

¶3

Apn licant(s): Bank^{Of Maharashtra}

¶4

(hereina{ter referred to as bank^{/ financial institution)}

¶5

VF],RSUS

¶6

Defe ndant(s) : Haribhau^{Narayan Kapre} (hereinafter referred to^{as / borrower / guarantor(s))}

¶7

Details of dispute^{/ claim: The claimof the bankis to the tune of} P<s. 24,66,797l-^{withcost and interest.}

¶8

The defendant/s^{has paid the dues in his / theirloan account an amount of} Rs. 26,9l,9g9^{/- ( TwentySix Lakh NinetyOne Thousand Nine Hundred} Eighty Ninc Rupees^{only) as settlementamount under OTS'Therefore'the} applicant bank^{does not want to proceed further'Hence present Original} Application may^{be withdrawnas per the Consent Terms/Pursis filed by the} applicant bank^{which is markedas 'A''}

¶9

The request for^{retumof original documents as per rules is permitted'} SirrcethematterisbeforethespecialandNationalLok-Adalat,theCourtFees be refunded to^{the applicant bankas perrules,}

¶10

in view of the above Consent Terms filed on^{record /uploaded online.The} defendant is Present/absent today.

¶11

Applicant(s)

¶12

Defendant(s)

¶13

Advocate for the App licant(s) /Authorised Reprcsentative

¶14

Advocate for thc Defcndant(s) /Authorised Ilcpresen lve

¶15

-.-.<. 4rloq\z⁶

¶16

Adv. Sanjay Nandure Membcr Special and National Lok Adalat

¶17

¶18

Shri. Ma n d Adrvant Chairman Spccial and National Lok Adalat

Date : 25.04.2026

Place : Aurangabad.

ORDER/AWART)

In view of the above consent terms which are^{filedonline/offlinein the} present matter, the order is passed. The @--t-15/2025-stands^disposedof accordingly.

¶23

Refund of Court Fees is allowed as^per rules. Original^{documents be} retumed as per DRT Procedurc Rules.

¶24

¶25

Date : 25.04.2026

¶26

(Shri. Ma nd Adwant) CHAIRMAN Spccial and National Lok Adalat

¶27

¶28

--)

¶29

Debts Recovery Tribunals (DRTs)

¶30

GOVERNMENT OF rNDrA I MTNTSTRY OF FTNANCI

¶31

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAT SERVICES

¶32

377 4/2026

¶33

BANK OF MAHARASHTRA

¶34

HARIBHAU NARAYAN KAPARE

¶35

25-O4-2026

¶36

aL-A

¶37

BI.]F'ORE I'IIE SPT]CIAI, AND NATIONAL^{I,OK ADAI,A'I'} ORGANISI]D ON^25th APRII,.2026^{BY THE} DT]81'S RI,],COVI,]RY T^RIBUNAI, AT]RANGABAT)

¶38

oA No. lrs of 2o?,4

¶39

WITIIDRAWAI, PURSIS

¶40

ADD licanl(s): i]"r,\ ol fY.{h.-..r)r)-q

¶41

vuRslls

¶42

Defendant(s) : Hq_,., bL.r,^.{ l-o fl-" ( hereinalier referred to as / borrower /^guarantor(s) )

¶43

I)ctails of disDutc /^claim: The claim of the bank^{is to the tune of} Il. s. with cost and interest.

¶44

Thc defendanvs has^{paidthe duesin his / their loan account an amountof} :Rs. 2 - - t-'t c Ar^or9 _-- -n as settlement^{amount under oTS. Therefore,the applicant} bank does not want^{to proceed furlher. Hence present originalApplicationmay} be u,ithdrawn^{as per the present withdrawalPursis filed by the bank}

¶45

The request for retum^{of originaldocuments as per rules may be permitted.} Since the matter is before^{the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the CourtFees} nray please be refunded^{to the applicant bankas per rules'}

¶46

Applicant(s )

¶47

Defendant(s)

¶48

voca te for the Applicant(s) /Authoriscd RePresentative

¶49

Advocate for the^Defendant(s) /Authorised Representative

¶50

Date : 25-4-2026 Place : Aurangabad.

Bank of Maharashtra v. Haribhau Narayan Kapare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of Maharashtra v. Haribhau Narayan Kapare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Gurjit Kaur

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Baldev Singh

Punjab National Bank versus Sh. Baltej Singh

Bank of India versus Pradeep Sharma

Hdfc Bank Ltd. versus Harjeet Singh Gill

Icici Bank Limited versus Ganesh Petroleum , through Its Proprietor, Yogesh Ganesh Butale