Disposed
State Bank of India v. Ms G K Dewangan through Its Proprietor Gavendra Kumar Dewangan
DRTOA/1105/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
GONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO.
,GASE NO
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER |
|---|---|
| oA.1105/23 90.01.26 |
Appticantby ShrlR.S.Pramar, Advocate Nonefor theDefendants |
| CounsetfortheAppticantfitedanApp[icatfon for withdrawatondated16.12.24wlthaffldavitofShriSaJan Josephlrtathew,Chieffilanager.ltisstatedthatrinthe instant OAtheappticanthavesettledtheaccountby depositing anamountofRs23,65,4261' hasbedndepositgd as' setttement.TheCounsetforappticantpraysfor withdrawatof thepresentOA. ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheOfficeroftheapptlcant bankandthesubmissionmadebytheCounse[forApptlcant that theappticanthasdepositedan amountlofRs.23, 65,4261-towardssetttementofthecase,thepresentOA stands disposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbeconsignedto the recordroom. I |
|
| o<br>(PravasrumTttngtr) Presidingofficer,' DRT:LUCKNOW lncharge: DRTJabatpur |
| REMARK |
|---|
.:': l-p.*'..,.i:l
Praveen Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court