Punjab Printers v. Urgo Capital Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant withdrew the application. The impugned order under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA/87/2025 PUNJAB PRINTERS Vs URGO CAPITAL LIMITED
27.01.2026 Item No.109
Present: Mr. Vipul Babuta, Counsel for the Applicant (on VC). None for respondents.
Counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to pursue the present MA and the same is hereby dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
PUNJAB PRINTERS
URGO CAPITAL LIMITED
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court