Canara Bank v. Arul
Case brief
What is this about?
Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an application for condonation of delay by Canara Bank, condoning a 721-day delay in re-presenting an Old Application due to counsel's absence. Direct compliance cost and timeline were mandated.
What did the court decide?
Application allowed; delay of 721 days condoned subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- to TNSLRA by 20.02.2026.
What the court decided
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 23rd day of January 2026
Present: SMT. S.V. GOWRAMMA Presiding Officer
M.A. No.418 of 2025 in OA Dy. No.3528/2023
Canara Bank, Velachery Branch, Velachery, Chennai – 600 042. ...Applicant
-Vs-
Arul T.T., S/o T.I. Thomas, No.44/10, Orandiamankovil avenue, Velachery, Chennai – 600 042. …Defendant
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s. Jayanandakumar
ORDER IN MA No. 418/2025
- MA No. 418 of 2025 is taken up. This is an application filed by
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 721 days in re-presenting the application for recovery of money due from borrower should be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Canara Bank, Velachery Branch
- respondent
Arul T.T.
Coram
SMT. S.V. GOWRAMMA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court