The court dismissed M.A. No. 36 of 2025 due to the applicant's non-appearance and lack of representation, indicating disinterest in pursuing the case. All pending interim applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 01.06.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II M.A. No.36 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr Prakhar Dixit i/b M/s. Phoenix Legal, Advocate for Defendants. |
|||
| rst – 15 | Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar dated 27.01.2026 shows that no representation was made by the Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, M.A. No.36 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Defendants
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
