, In the affidavit filed by petitioner/Defendant No.2, he averred that the OA.No.390/2O11, filed by the l"t Respondent/Applicant Bank for Rs.65,86,363.65ps., with future interest @ lg.2So/o p.a., was allowed by this Tribunal and Recovery Certificate was issued for Rs.S1,24,802.3lps., with future interest @ la.2}%o p.a., from lO.O2.2Ol8, after adjusting an amount of Rs. I ,04,75 ,OOO / _, which was recovered by the 1"t Respondent Bank, during the pendency ofthe OA, by selling the secured asset on og.o2.2olg under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act. He further averred that the claim of the Applicant Bank as per the Recovery certificate with interest calculated from 10.02.201g till 10.06.2025 will come to Rs. 1,19,83 ,492.2sps. He also averred that, he challenged the sale of the secured asset conducted by the 1st Respondent/Applicant B1lk. by filing SA.No.51/2018 before this Tribunal and the saii and that he carried the matter "-- :;-': ' t-:'' :'"-ttr'-- in appeal viae.i{1p6At'ivp,po7i@\rore " the Hon,ble DRAT, Kotkata and the saia,{pgrar , ""'iiio.a ",f$;pz.zoz4 f{ lx and the auction of the secured asset was s8t3slffi ffiBurths4i"erred that, since the auction is set-aside, amount of ,000/-(which was deducted earlier) is to Certificate claim amount of
