Mohit Gupta v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Application was dismissed in default because no one appeared on behalf of the applicant despite three copies calling, at the hearing starting at 3:00 p.m., at Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Chandigarh.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA/22/2024 MOHIT GUPTA Vs CANARA BANK
02.07.2026 Item No.110
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr.Rajan Puri, Counsel for respondent bank (on vc)
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
MOHIT GUPTA
- respondent
CANARA BANK
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court