Partly allowed

Mr. Ram Mohan Seth v. Uco Bank

DRT9 Feb 2026MA/5/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this order, the Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the condonation of a six-day delay in filing an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to set aside an ex parte judgment. The tribunal permitted the registration of the new petition as a miscellaneous application and listed it for future hearing.

What did the court decide?

Allowance of condonation of six days delay; direction to register the petition as a Miscellaneous Application.

Mr. Ram Mohan Seth versus Uco Bank — Execution and Attachment | DRT (2026)

¶1

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA

¶2

	Order Sheet (continuation)
NDN 1058 of 2016)	2024 (OA 395 of MR. RAМ МОНAN SETH-VS- UCO BANK
Date of the Order	Order with Signature	Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary
09.02.2026	Ld. AdvocateMr. Koushik Dasappears for the NDN
	Applicant. Ld. Advocate Mr.Mollaappears for the Respondent Bank. Certificate Debtor nos. 1 and 2 have filed application u/s 22(2) (g) of the RDB Act. Read with Rule 18 of the Recovery of Debts Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules,1994 for recall of order dated 10/05/2024 and judgment dated 03/07/2024 in OA/395 of 2016.
	NDN Applicant has also filed another petition u/s 5 of the limitation Act,1963 for condonation of delay of six days. Exparte judgment was delivered on 03/07/2024. The defendants were set
	aside exparte on 10/05/2024. The petitioner has filed this application for setting aside exparte judgment dated 03/07/2024 which was sent and served upon them on 25/09/2024.
	Respondent Bank has filed objection to the delay
	condonation petition contending that there is six days delay. Perused track report which speaks that copy of judgment was served on defendants (C.Ds.) on 25/09/2024 and this MA is
	filed on 05/11/2024. Petition for setting aside exparte judgment is

¶3

Rina S.

¶4

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA

¶5

Date of the Order	Order with Signature	Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary
	to be filed within 30 days. There is delay of six days which is not inordinate. Hence delay condonation petition is allowed. Ld. Registrar is directed to registerNDN 1058 of 2024as MA.
	Respondent Bank has filed objection to theNDN 1058 of 2024.
	The matter be listed before Ld. Registrar on 26/02/2026. After Registration of MA the Registry is directed to list the
	matter before this Bench for hearing.

¶6

Rina S.

Mr. Ram Mohan Seth v. Uco Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Ram Mohan Seth v. Uco Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Jayasree Das versus State Bank of India

Biswajit Bhowmick versus Bank of India

Sekh Golap Badsha versus Yes Bank

State Bank of India versus Sri Pradip Chatterjee

State Bank of India versus Ms Pinki Agarwal

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Mohanty Enterprises