Dina Nath v. Indian Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA/20/2026 DINA NATH Vs INDIAN BANK
03.07.2026
Item No.109
Present: None for the Applicant. Ms. Prerna, proxy Counsel for Ms. Deepika Mittal, Counsel for respondent bank (on VC).
Case called many times since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:40 p.m. It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dina Nath
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court