State Bank of India v. Noushad
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal allowed the condonation of 161 days delay in re-presenting an Originating Application filed by SBI for recovery of debt, relying on HC precedent, and imposed a cost condition.
What did the court decide?
Condonation of 161 days delay; payment of Rs. 2,000 to TN State Legal Services Authority; opportunity to prosecute the case.
What the court decided
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 24th day of July 2026
Present: SMT. S.V. GOWRAMMA Presiding Officer
M.A. No.168 of 2026 in OA Dy.No.169/2026
State bank of India, Stressed Assets Recovery Branch-II (SARB-II) No.44, Eldams road, Teynampet, Chennai- 600018 Represented by its Manager ...Applicant -Vs-
Mr. Noushad, S/o Mr. Ahmed Kutty, Duplex flat No.B (Flat No.7B) Block-VIII, Kences Enclave, D.No.1, Ramakrishna street, T. Nagar, Chennai- 600017
Also at: Mr. Noushad, S/o Mr. Ahmed Kutty, No.34172/3, DLF Garden city, Thazambur Panchayat, Thazhambur Chennai- 600130
Also at: Mr. Noushad, S/o Mr. Ahmed Kutty, Apple Supermaket, Plot No.18B, Thanthai Periyar salai, Kumaran nagar, Chemmencherry, Chennai- 119
Also at: Mr. Noushad, S/o Mr. Ahmed Kutty, Palapura House, Farroq nagar, Panakkathahem Kodinhi PO Nannambra, Mallapuram Dist, Kerala- 676309
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 161 days in re-presenting the Originating Application for recovery of debt should be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Mr. Noushad
Coram
S.V. Gowramma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court