Dismissed
Mrs Panchawati Uttam Dak v. Bank of Maharashtra
DRTMA/14/2026
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Withdrawal of M.A. No.14 of 2026 allowed with liberty to file fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 10.06.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-III M.A. No.14 of 2026 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms Janvhi Dube a/w Ms Amrutha Perumal, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms Sushila Vichire, Advocate for the Respondent. |
|||
| Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that possession was already taken on 13.05.2026 and Applicant wants to file fresh MA and incorporate new facts and events. Heard and considered. I.A. No.2111 of 2026 for withdrawal of MA No.14 of 2026 is allowed with the liberty to the Applicant to file fresh one. No order as to costs. |
|||
| Tjs- 10 | Resultantly, M.A. No.14 of 2026 stands disposed of as withdrawn. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- I/c P.O. DRT-III, Mumbai At: DRT-II, Mumbai |
Closed |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court