This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 10
Case No.MA/136/2026 IN SA/518/2022
GOG CHAND RAIGAR Vs LAXMI INDIA FINLEASECAP PRIVATE
LIMITED
Date: 17.06.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode:
Present:
Shri H P Bairwa, Counsel for the applicant
Shri Akarsh Mathur, Counsel for the Respondent
This MA is filed for restoration of SA which was disposed of vide order dated 08.07.2025.
Heard arguments.
There is no cognizant ground to restore the SA, which is strongly opposed by the respondent counsel. If the applicant is aggrieved, he can file fresh SA against the measures taken by the Respondent FI within limitation.
Accordingly, prayer to restore the SA is rejected and MA stands dismissed.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
GOG CHAND RAIGAR
LAXMI INDIA FINLEASECAP PRIVATE LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
