In this debt recovery tribunal order, no applicant appeared for a second hearing call. The Presiding Officer dismissed the matter due to lack of applicant interest and consigned the file to the record room.
The matter was dismissed due to the absence of the applicant on the second call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ORDER SHEET DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI
MA/11/2026 in OA/105/2023
Mrs. Riya Sarkar Applicant Vs Canara Bank Defendants
| Date of Order |
Order with Signature | Office action with date and dated signature of |
|---|---|---|
| parties when | ||
| necessary. | ||
| Item No.10 | Order No.11 |
08.09.2026
Present:
Counsel for the applicant : None.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. P.K. Sikdar.
No one appears for the applicant and on previous date of hearing also no one had participated in the hearing for the applicant.
List this matter for second call.
RAKESH Digitally signed by RAKESH PATI TIWARI PATI TIWARI Date: 2026.09.09 17:00:55 +05'30'
(RAKESH PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
Later on:-
Counsel for the applicant : None.
Counsel for the respondent : None.
Hearing is made in hybrid mode.
The matter is again called out for second time but no one appears for the applicant and thus it seems that the applicant has got no interest in the matter and accordingly the case is dismissed .
Let the file be consigned to the Record Room.
Order be uploaded in the website of the Tribunal.
RAKESH Digitally signed by RAKESH PATI TIWARI PATI TIWARI Date: 2026.09.09 17:01:08 +05'30'
(RAKESH PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
Mrs. Riya Sarkar
Canara Bank
Rakesh Pati Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
