The Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application as withdrawn after the applicant's nodal officer stated that a compromise had been reached and the account closed.
The TA is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
TA/99/2022 STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs M/S PUBLIC TRADERS
10.03.2025 Item No.87
Present: Mr. Divjot, Nodal Officer of the Applicant bank. None for defendants.
Mr. Divjot, has produced on the record copy of statement of account and has made a statement at the Bar that parties have compromise the matter and account has been closed. Accordingly, the TA is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
STATE BANK OF INDIA
M/S PUBLIC TRADERS
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
