In a dispute arising under a DRT, the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a transfer application as withdrawn by the Bank. The bank sought withdrawal after defendants deposited dues and the loan was closed via a compromise letter.
The transfer application was dismissed as withdrawn. The interim application regarding withdrawal was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi TA/e61 12023 BANK OF INDIA VS MR PRANAVKUMAR. THAKUR.
30.10.2025
Item no. 57
Present: Shri Sahil Ralli, counsel for applicantbank. Shri Rustham Singh, counsel fordefendant no. 3. Ms. Shakshi Goyal, counsel for defendantno. 4. None for other defendants.
Matter is taken through VideoConferencing/ HybridMode.
File be consigned torecord room.
Y/ (SUSHIL KUI,RR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
BANK OF INDIA
MR PRANAV KUMAR. THAKUR
DEFENDANT NO. 3
DEFENDANT NO. 4
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
