Debts Recovery Tribunal granted withdrawal of the transferแอปel upon defendants arriving at a settlement with the applicant bank and closing the loan account.
Withdrawal of TA allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; original documents returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribuna!-Il, Delhi
rA/e08 12023 IDBI BANK VS HARENDRA SINGH RAWAT ANDANOTHER
29.01.2025
Item no.76
Present: Mr. Naveen Kumar, counsel for applicant bank. Ms. Samridhi Malhotra, counsel for defendant no,2.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/ hybridMode.
IA dy. no.L67l2O24 has been filed by the applicantbank for withdrawal of thepresent TA.
The Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank submits thatthe defendants have arrived at a settlementwith the Applicant Bank and matter is settled. The Ioan accounthas been closed in terms of settlement. He further submits that hewish to withdraw the present TA. Ld. Counsel for applicant bank alsoprayed for return of the original documents.
In view of amicable settlement, IA dy. no.L67 12024is allowed. TA 90gl2023 is dismissed aswithdrawn,being amicably settled. Registry is directed toreturn the origina! documents after keeping the ceftifiedcopies on records. All the pending IAs stand disposed of.
File be consigned to record room
^- _d,:^</sup>
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
IDBI Bank
Harendra Singh Rawat
Another
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
