An appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal-II, Delhi was dismissed in default for non-prosecution as the applicant bank did not appear despite issuance of a default notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TAl799l2024 ATLAHABAD BANK Vs JAI MATA DI GoGIsTIcs & ANOTHER
20.08.202s
Item no. 16
Present: None.
Matter is taken through video conferen cingl Hybrid Mode.
Despite issuance of defautt notice, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant bank. It appears that the applicant bank is not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present rA is dismissed in default for nonprosecution.
File be consigned to records.
g,N (susHrl KoMAR RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
ATLAHABAD BANK
JAI MATA DI LOGISTICS & ANOTHER
g,n kusum komar raostogt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
