Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

State Bank of India versus Smt Leena Mehrotra — DRT (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
DRT
2025
State Bank of India versus Smt Leena MehrotraState Bank of India v. Smt Leena Mehrotra

Dismissed

State Bank of India v. Smt Leena Mehrotra

DRT27 Jun 2025TA/710/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application allowed to be withdrawn due to settlement between parties.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn, being settled.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il,^Delhi

TAl7LOl2022 STATE BANK^{OF INDIA VS SMTLEENA} MEHROTRA

27.06.2025

Item no.27

Present: Shri^{Yogesh Pachauri, counsel for applicant} bank.

None for defendants.

Matter is taken^{through Video Conferencing/ Hybrid Mode'}

The Ld. Counsel^{for applicant bank submits that the matter} has been settled^{between the parties. Therefore,he} requested for^{withdrawal of the present oA. Request is} allowed.

In view of the^{above submissionmade by the Ld. counsel} for applicant^{bank, f Al7tOl2O22 is dismissedas withdrawn,} being settled.

File be consigned^{to records.}

eA\ (SUSHIL KUMAR^RASTOGI) PRESIDING^OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
STATE BANK OF INDIA
respondent
LEENA MEHROTRA

Coram

AI extract

SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: DRT
Decided on: 27 Jun 2025 · June
Case no.: TA/710/2022
CNR: 070120023322022

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

Cite this judgement

State Bank of India v. Smt Leena Mehrotra, TA/710/2022 (DRT), decided on 27 June 2025.

The Debt Recovery Tribunals publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Application dismissed as withdrawn, being settled.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Application allowed to be withdrawn due to settlement between parties. File consigned to records.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

P