Disposed
Icici Bank Limited v. Vijay Patil
DRTTA/67/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 30.05.2025 | Esh. | Roznama-MDRT-II T.O.A. No.67 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms Mandira Dey i/b M/s. Vidhii Partners, Advocate for the Applicant. None for the Defendant. |
|||
| rst -16 | 9 | Applicant Bank has filed Withdrawal Application I.A. No.949 of 2025 supported by affidavit (exhibit-9) for withdrawal of the T.O.A. No.67 of 2023. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the matter has been amicably settled with the Defendant as the Defendant has paid as sum of Rs.8,50,000/- to which the Applicant had issued Settlement letter dated 24.01.2025 to the Defendants. In view of the submissions made, the Applicant seeks withdrawal of the T.O.A. The I.A. No.949 of 2025 is allowed and T.O.A. No.67 of 2023 stands disposed of as withdrawn. The Applicant shall be entitled to refund the court fees if the Rules permit. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant Bank
- respondent
Defendant
Coram
AI extract
P.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court