The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the present appellant's appeal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn upon the bank's submission that the loan account has been closed.
IA no.36 of 2025 allowed; Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; Court fee refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal_Il, Delhi
TA166612023 STATE BANK OF INDIh MR. DALBIR SINGH DAHIYA & ORS. ';
29.07.2025
Item no. 17
Present IhrlPradeep Dhaka, counsel for applicant bank.
Matter is taken through Video Conferen cing/Hybrid Mode.
rA no'36 r2o2s has been fired by the appricant bank for withdrawal of the prOsent TA.
The Ld. counsel for the applicant bank submits that the loan account has arready been crosed in the books of the applicant bank and nothing remains to recover the defendants. He further submits that he wishes to withdraw the present TA. Ld. Counsel for applica nt bank also prayed for refund of the court fee.
In view of the above submission made by Ld. counser for applicant ban( IA no.36,2o25 is allowed. TAl66Gl2O2g is dismissed as withd rawn. Registry is directed to refund the coult fee as per rules, All the pending IAs stand disposed of.
File be consigned to record room.
Date already fixed on Tribunal stands canceiled.
09.06.2025 before this
d' (susHrl KUMAR nnsroel) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Bank of India
Dalbir Singh Dahiya & Ors.
Kumar Nonsroy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
