Bank of Baroda v. Amit Kumar & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the applicant bank's application in default for non-prosecution as the bank did not appear despite issuance of a default notice.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TAl60412024
BANK OF BARODA VS AMIT KUMAR & ORS
20.08.2025
Item no.24
Present None for applicant bank Defendants are ex-pafte since 0L.12.2024
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/Hybridmode.
None appeared on behalf of the applicant banksince 04.02.2025. Despite issuance of default notice none appearedtoday. It appears that the applicant bankis not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, thepresent TA is dismissedin default for non- prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
t-\ (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court