Canara Bank v. Sai Enterprieses and Rs
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi
rAl493l2022
CANARA BANK VS SAI ENTERPRIESESANDRS
29.07.2025
Item no. 38
Present Shri S.K. Jha, counsel for applicantbank. None for defendants.
Matter is taken through VideoConferen cingl Hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for applicantbank submits that the matter has settled between theparties under the OTS and applicant has receivedthe OTS amount. Therefore, he requested for withdrawal ofthe present TA. Request is allowed.
In view of the above submissionmade by the Id. Counsel for applicant bank,TA149312022is dismissed as withdrawn, being settled.
File be consigned to records.
--\ U.i (SUSHIL KUMan .IASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
Parties & counsel
- applicant
CANARA BANK
- respondent
SAI ENTERPRISES
Coram
SUSHIL KUMAR ASTOGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court