The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the bank's appeal in default for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear after notice, indicating lack of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TA/4O8 120,24 STATE BANK OF INDIA VS MS KRISPYLICIOUS FOODS PvT LTD AND ORS
24.t2.2025
Item no.28
Present: None
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/Hybrid mode.
None appeared on behalf of the applicant bank on 26.08.2025. Despite issuance of default notice none appeared today. It appears that the applicant bank is not interested inpursuing the case. Hence, thepresent TA is dismissed in default for nonprosecution.
File be consigned to records.
9i (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
c
STATE BANK OF INDIA
MS KRISPYLICIOUS FOODS Pvt Ltd
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
