Icici Bank Limited v. Nitika
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 34 of the Press Code, 1990, as withdrawn due to amicable settlement between the applicant bank and the respondent, allowing the withdrawal of said application.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the present TA (Application) allowed as amicably settled.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TA/31012024 ICICI BANK LIMITED Vs NITIKA DUA
27.08.2025
Item no.37
Present Mr. Bikash Kumar Jha, counsel for applicant bank. None for defendants.
Matter is taken through Video Conferenctngl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for applicant bank submits that the matter has been settled between the pafties. He requested for withdrawal of the present TA. Request is allowed.
In view of the above submission made by the ld. Counsel for applicant bank, TA 310/2024 is dismissed as withdrawn, being amicably settled.
File be consigned to records.
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Parties & counsel
- applicant
ICICI BANK LIMITED
- respondent
NITIKA DUA
Coram
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court