Matter was settled between the parties and Non Opposing Counsel (NOC) was filed. Applicant bank admitted the settlement and requested withdrawal. Application dismissed as withdrawn by consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TAl28412022
STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs MR. VIKRANT KUSHWAHA & ANR.
26.06.2025
Item no. 54
Present
Mr. R.K. Sinha, counse! for applicant bank. Mr. Amol Choudhary counsel for defendant no.l. Ms. Ritu, proxy counsel for defendant no.2.
Matter is taken through video conferen cing/ hybrid Mode.
The prory counsel for defendant no.2 has submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and she has filed NOC vide dy. no.622712025.
The Ld. counsel for applrcant bank has admitted the same and He has requested for withdrawal of the present rA. Request is allowed.
In view of the above submission made by the ld. counsel for applicant bank and defendants, TA z}4lzoz2 is dismissed as withdrawn, being amicably settled.
File be consigned to records.
S\ (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICE& DRT-II, Delhi
A
STATE BANK OF INDIA
MR. VIKRANT KUSHWAHA
ANR.
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
