Bank of Baroda v. Chithra
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRT allowed an interim application seeking security or attachment of property. The court directed the third respondent to furnish security or face attachment of the schedule property to secure the bank's dues.
What did the court decide?
Directed third respondent to show cause why he should not furnish security of Rs.60,26,534/- within 15 days or face attachment of schedule property.
What the court decided
IA No.919/24 in TA No.230/2023
13.10.2025
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 13th day of October, 2025
Present: SMT. S.V. GOWRAMMA Presiding Officer
I.A. No.919 of 2024 in T.A. No. 230 of 2023
Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) Rangarajapuram Branch No.25, 1st Street, Nagarjuna Nagar Kodambakkam Chennai – 600 024 Rep. by its Manager
….Petitioner / Applicant
-Vs-
- Mrs. V. Chithra W/o S. Elenchelian No.4, 4A, Lakshmi Nagar 2nd Street, Kolamppakkam
Chennai – 600 048
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant bank is entitled to an order of Attachment Before Judgment to secure its claim against the third respondent's property to prevent alienation.
Whether the third respondent must furnish security or face attachment of the schedule property.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) Rangarajapuram Branch
- respondent
Mrs. V. Chithra
- respondent
M/s The Pure and Sure Supermarket
- respondent
Mr. Elenchielian
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court