Yes Bank v. M/S Arham Gems and Jewels
Case brief
What is this about?
Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an application for non-prosecution as the applicant bank failed to appear after service of a default notice.
What did the court decide?
The application is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TAl23l2022 YES BANK VS M/S ARHAM GEMS AND JEWELS
22.07.2025
Item no. 41
Present: None for applicant bank. Ms. Supreeti Chauhan, counsel for defendants.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencinglhybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for defendantshas appeared todaybefore this Tribunal.
Despite issuance of defaultnotice, no one appearedon behalf of tlre applicant bank. Itappearsthat the applicantbank is not interested inpursuing the case. Hence,the presentTA is dismissed in default for non-Prosecution.
File be consigned torecord.
-il
(SUSHIL KU Mrhn RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow or dismiss an application for recovery proceedings where the applicant bank does not comply with the call for appearance.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
YES BANK
Coram
SUSHIL KU MHIRAN RASTOGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court