State Bank of India v. Anshul Gupta
Case brief
What is this about?
Tribunal dismissed the applicant bank's application in default for non-prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant bank.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
srArE BAN K Jli'-'JrIi3'^1 t u L G u PrA "
2L.08.2025
Item no. 37
Present: None for applicant bank.
Ms. Ritu, proxy counsel for defendantno.2.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/hybrid Mode.
The proxy counsel for defendantno.2 has appearedtodaybefore this Tribunal and submitted that thematterhas been settled.
Despite repeated calls, no one appearedon behalf of the applicant bank. It appears that the applicantbank is not interestedin pursuing the case. Hence, thepresent TA is dismissedin default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
g,^ (SUSHIL KUIVUAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicant Bank
- respondent
Defendant No. 2
Coram
Sushil Kuviar Rastogi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court