In a returnable application in a recovery matter, the applicant bank did not appear or prosecute the case. The Tribunal dismissed the TA in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts RecoveryTribunal-Il, Delhi
TAlL793l2022 pHOENIX ARC Ptrr LTb. Vs NEELKANTELECTRONICS
19.09.2025
Item no'27
Present:None for aPPlicant bank Mr. AK Sharma,Counsel for defendants
Matter istaken throughVideo Conferencing/ Hybrid Mode'
None appearedbehalf of the applicant Pult. Noneappeared today. Itappears that the applicant lrr!is not interestedin prrtring the'case.Hence, the present TA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consignedto records.
(SUSHIL KUMAN ')^;RASTOGI) PRESIDINGOFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
c
NEELKANT ELECTRONICS
PHOENIX ARC
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
