In a Debt Recovery Tribunal matter, the court dismissed the applicant's temporary admissibility application in default due to the absence of counsel and the apparent lack of interest by the applicant in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TAlL78,8l2022 PHOENIX ARC PVT. LTD Vs MARTAND ENGINEERS PvT.LTD
23.09.2025 Item no.39
Present None for applicant FI
Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Counsel for defendants
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/ Hybrid Mode.
None appeared on behalf of the applicant FI. None appeared today. It appears that the applicant FI is not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present TA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
gA (susHrl rtftnn RAsroGr) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
PHOENIX ARC PVT. LTD
PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
