Adjustment for withdrawal of the present application (TA) allowed upon amicable settlement and issue of No Dues certificate. High court application dismissed as withdrawn. Court fee refund directed.
RA No.25012025 allowed; TA 159L12o22 dismissed as withdrawn; court fee refund directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TA/1s9L|2022 BANK OF BARODA Vs MRS SHMNI LUTHRA AND ORS LUTHTRA
30.01 .2025
Item no. 62
Present Mr. Aditya Kumar Jha, counsel for applicant bank. None for defendants.
Matter is taken through Video Conferenctng/ hybrid Mode.
rA no.25ol2o25 has been filed by the applicant bank for withdrawal of the present TA.
The Ld. counsel for the applicant bank submits that the in terms of the compromise/settlement in the Loan Account bearing No. 26390600000189 and No Dues certificate issued dated 29.08.2022. He further submits that he wish to withdraw the present rA. Ld. Counsel for applicant bank also prayed for refund of the court fee.
In view of amicable settlement, rA no.2solzo25 is allowed. TA 159L12o22 is dismissed as withdrawn, being amicabty settled. Registry is directed to refund the couft fee as per rules. All the pending IAs stand disposed of.
File be consigned to record room.
_--1 E} (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Bank of Baroda
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
