The DRT-II, Delhi allowed a withdrawal application filed by the Bank of Baroda upon receipt of a settled sum of Rs. 21,00,000, thereby dismissing the recovery petition as amicably settled and disposing of pending applications.
Withdrawal of application allowed; recovery petition dismissed as withdrawn due to amicable settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribuna!-Il, Delhi
TA/133612023 BANK OF BARODA Vs MR. MEGHRA, CHANDELA
27.0L.2025
Item no. 69
Present Mr. Girish Verma, counsel for applicant bank. None for defendants.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
IA no.204l2025 has been filed by the applicant bank for withdrawal of the present TA.
The Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank submits that the Applicant Bank has received the entire settled amount of Rs.21,00,000.00 and there remains no outstanding dues against the defendants. He further submits that he wish towithdraw the present TA.
In view of amicable settlement, IA no.204l2025 is allowed. TA 133612023 is dismissed as withdrawn, beingamicably settled. All thepending IAs stand disposed of.
File be consigned to record room.
9; (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bank of Baroda
Mr. Meghra
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
