The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the applicant bank to withdraw its application upon mutual settlement outside the court. The matter was dismissed as withdrawn without contest from the defendant side.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DebtsRecoveryTribunal-Il'Delhi
rA/130/2- 9?t , vs I(ARuNENDRA EDELwErss Hou$I[J# srNGH
Itemno.95
22.t2.2025
Present Mr.AkashGupta,Counselforapplicantbank Nonefor defendants
MatteristakenthroughVideoConferencing/Hybridmode.
The Ld.Counsel for applicantbank synlitte{ that he has filed application/rn/:ggsl2o2.3torwitnarawalofmatter.Itissubmittedthat theparties nal',mutually settled the presentmatter outside of this courtandboththepartiesagreedonthesettlementclausewhichwas heldbetweenthem.Thattheapplicantbankhasgiveninstructionvia e.mailtowithdrawthepresentmatter.rnecopyoftheE-mailand settlementletterareannexed.Theapplicantseekingbeforethis Hon,bleCourttoattowhimtowithdrawthepresentmatter.
InviewoftheabovesubmissionmadebytheLd.Counselforapplicantouni, ii';3e8i ioit is allowed' TA/13012074is dismissedas withdrawn'
File beconsigned to record room'
9A (susHILKUIT ni RAsr-oGI) PRESIDINGOFFICER DRT-II,Delhi
Rudrendra Edelson Singh
Sushil Kaur Rasogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
