The Debts Recovery Tribunal by video conferencing dismissed the applicant bank's application due to non-prosecution. No counsel appeared for the bank, which was deemed uninterested in pursuing the case.
Dismissal of the TA (Application) for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovety Tribunal-Il,Delhi
TAlL24sl2023 UNION BANK OF INDIAVS ASHWANIKUMAR AND OTHERS
18.09.2025
Item no.24
Present: None for aPPlicantbank. Shri Amol Chaudhary,counsel for defendant no. 1 and 2.
None for defendantno. 3.
Matter is taken throughVideo Conferencing/Hybrid Mode.
Despite repeated calls,today, none appeared on behalf of the applicant bank.It appearsthat applicantbank is not interested inpursuing the case. Hence, the present TA is dismissed in defaultfor non-prosecution.
File be consigned torecords.
eA (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
UNION BANK OF INDIA
ASHWANIKUMAR AND OTHERS
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
