The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an applicant bank's transfer application in default for non-prosecution as the bank did not appear despite default notice explicitly stating lack of interest in pursuing the case.
The present transfer application is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts RecoverYTribunal-Il,Delhi
TA/ 1007 I 2022
UNIO BANK OF INDIA(CORPORATION BANK) Vs NAKUL TOKAS & ANR.
2L.08.2025
Item no'44
Present:None for aPPlicant bank
Mr. RR Kumar,Counsel for defendants
Matter is takenthroughVideo Conferencing/Hybrid mode'
None appearedon behalf of the applicant bank on 29'04'2024' Despite issuanceof default noticenone appeared today'. It upp.utt thatthe applicant bank is not interested in pursuing the case.Hence,the'present transfer application is dismissed in default fornon-Prosecution.
File be consignedto records.
_=!_
EA
(SUSHIL KI,MARRASTOGI) PRESIDINGOFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
c
Uni. Bank of India (Corporation Bank)
Nakul Tokas
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
