In the absence of the applicant appearing to argue a special application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, the Presiding Officer dismissed the application in default due to non-appearance after multiple hearings.
Application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/97/2025 SAGAR SAINI SO DALIP CHAND SAINI Vs PIRAMAL CAPITAL AND HOUSING FINANCE LTD
29.08.2025 Item No.4
Present: None for the Applicant.
Sh.Nitin Grover, Counsel for respondent FI.
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
1 issue framed by the court
What is the consequence when an applicant fails to appear in the third pass despite notice?
SAGAR SAINI
DALIP CHAND SAINI
PIRAMAL CAPITAL AND HOUSING FINANCE LTD
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
