Disposed
Ms Sahab and Sahiba v. Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank
DRTSA/97/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| Date of order or rcceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| SA 97 of 2024 | ||
| 18.09.2025 | Ld. counsel for the respondent bank is present. None is present for the applicant. Ithas been informed that the counter affidavit has already been filed. No rejoinder has been filed so far despite of the last opportunity granted to the applicant. From the perusal of record, it appears that the applicant is not appearing for last four dates.Itappears that the applicant has lost interestin this case. Accordingly, it is dismissed for non-prosecution. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Coram
AI extract
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court